Series are popular for authors and publishers, every genre book that’s released lately seems to be part of a series. But what do readers prefer?
For me, it depends on the type of book. When it comes to adult fantasy, the longer the series the better. I’m currently working my way through Wheel of Time – and have been for the past 6 years, 14 books and a prequel! – and am loving every step in the world. You get such great detail on character’s clothing, food, cultures, and the diverse world’s cities when the author doesn’t need to reign it in for a standalone book. A Song of Ice and Fire, the series that the TV show Game of Thrones is based on, is also a great long series. You may notice something that these two series have in common – they take an absolute age to write. The wait between books for authors like Robert Jordan and George R. R. Martin is legendary. Even writers like Brandon Sanderson, who puts out books at an alarming rate, can only produce a book in his Stormlight Archives series every 2-3 years. I like my fantasy books chunky and lengthy, and for me it’s worth the wait. But that’s not the case for every reader.
When it comes to YA, science fiction, or almost any other genre, I really do prefer the standalone. I like a self-contained, well-written book. If it must be a series, I much prefer a duology or a trilogy at most. Why? I’m not really sure. I’m reading The Expanse, which currently sits at six books with at least three more coming. It’s a great sci-fi series, but for some reason I’m not loving that it’s so long. The mind of a reader is a strange thing.
I love a series but I hate waiting for sequels for years! But I do think any book should work on it’s own and you shouldn’t have to read anything else to really understand it it should just enhance your experience. Although maybe that’s just my excuse for the way I keep reading series out of order!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ahhh! I could never read a series out of order. I get so anxious that I’m missing something important 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
I never mean to it just sort of happens to me! 99.9% of the time it has been completely fine and I’ve actually enjoyed the first book more after having read the second!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m with you. I would not trade my HP series, but I am glad that it’s just 7 books. At some point it will get dragged out and uninteresting. I hate when authors milk the whole thing to the last bits. I want them to stop when the reader craves more, but the author doesn’t get tempted and ends. And I think that’s why I re-read HP a lot. While Hunger Games could have been a standalone imo. The first book was awesome, second and third weren’t for me. Anyway, I usually prefer standalone 🙂 this was a long comment
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s kind of like TV shows in that they often get dragged out much further than they need to. I prefer a great, shorter story over a longer but lower quality one!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes! Like TV shows (I don’t watch them that much), but there are shows that just need to die!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Like you said, it depends on the type of book. Adult fantasies are always better when there’s multiple books. But not too many because then it gets too intimidating to start. I like a mix of both. But it seems that there are quite a few that are dragged on too long and would have been better as a stand alone or duology
LikeLiked by 1 person
I fall in the middle. I like a series, but the Wheel of Time is TOO long. I’m audio booking the final as I type and a big part of me can’t wait to put this chapter (HA!) of my life away.
Trilogies are nice, though I often wonder if a story is being stretched or cut just to fit into this 3-book format that all the publishers seem to want. I like seeing things like the Six of Crows duology, or The Demon Cycle that are breaking that mold (though I do worry the Demon Cycle could end up being “too long”)
LikeLiked by 1 person
Wheel of Time was definitely intimidating at first, particularly when you hear so much about the dreaded 7-10 slump, but I’m really enjoying it. Having spoiler-free breakdowns and walk through has really helped because there’s just SO much there.
You might be onto something there. I feel like the trilogy is the most desirable format right now, and I wouldn’t be surprised if authors were being asked to stretch their stories into three books.
LikeLike
I’m standalone. I’ve been burned by lackluster series and don’t have the patience for them. But, I do like duologies. Do they count?
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think duologies are the perfect compromise!
LikeLike
Definitely! Less commitment.
LikeLiked by 1 person